Jones v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentPair, Associate Judge
(dissenting) :
The decision of the majority is, in my opinion, contrary to the law in this jurisdiction.1 Viewing the record in the light most favorable to the appellant as we are required to do,2 there appears substantial evidence from which the jury could have found, as it did, that appellee was negligent in the maintenance of its store and that the injuries complained of were the natural and probable consequences of such negligence.
The trial court was, during the trial, apparently of the same view as indicated by a verbal exchange between the court and appellee’s counsel in disposing of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Simmonds v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Dixon v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
- McWilliams v. ShepardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Ruml v. Giant Food, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.