Legal Opinion

In re Asia Maritime Pacific Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 26, 2015No. 15-CV-2760 (VEC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

VALERIE CAPRONI, District Judge:

Asia Maritime Pacific, Ltd. (“Petitioner”), an entity organized under the laws of Hong Kong, petitioned ex parte, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, to obtain discovery from various banks and investment companies “for use in pending foreign proceedings and for purposes of locating assets of Arma Shipping & Chartering Co.” (“Arma”). Pet. at 1. Arma is alleged to be “a trading company with no significant hard assets held in its name.” Su Decl. ¶ 21. Arma failed to appear in a London arbitration that was commenced by Petitioner seeking damages flowing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Schmitz v. Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Mees v. BuiterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  4. Certain Funds, Accounts And/Or Investment Vehicles v. KPMG, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  5. Chevron Corp. v. BerlingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEMDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  2. IN RE APPLICATION OF YILPORT HOLDING A.S.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  3. In re Ex Parte Application of JSC UNITED CHEMICAL COMPANY URALCHEM for an Order to Conduct Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API