Anchor Concrete MacHinery Co. v. Pennsylvania Brick & Tile Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sadler,
The Anchor Concrete Machinery Company, plaintiff, was the manufacturer of patented devices used in the moulding of tiles and bricks, and contracted with the Cemprod Engineering & Construction Company to fur nish certain specified machines to be used by it in the erection of a plant for the Pennsylvania Brick & Tile Company, defendant in this proceeding. The work for the latter was carried on under an agreement with the Cemprod Company dated January 13,1923, which specified in detail the appliances to be installed. These were purchased by the contractor from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sherer-Gillett Co. v. LongIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Leitch v. Sanford Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- John Deere Plow Co. v. HersheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Schmidt v. BaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Commercial Motors Mortgage Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Delco Ice Manufacturing Co. v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Munz v. National Bond Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Holland Fur. Co. v. Suzik Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- General Refrigerator & Store Fixture Co. v. Patterson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1952