Legal Opinion

Holland Fur. Co. v. Suzik Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1935No. Appeal, 245PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

In this action of replevin the plaintiff appeals from a refusal of the learned court below to enter judgment n. o. v. or to grant a new trial.

The furnace, the title to which is in dispute, was installed November 7, 1931, in a house, which was owned at that time by Nick Suzik and Theresa Suzik, his wife. The property was sold at sheriff’s sale, and a deed, dated May 13, 1933, was executed therefor to Stephen Skapik, a judgment creditor. He conveyed it, by deed, dated October 2,1933, to Jessie A. Garrison, and either she or Skapik was in undisputed possession of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clayton v. LienhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Voorhis v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. Central Lithograph Co. v. Eatmor Chocolate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. National Bank v. NorthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Callahan v. Union Tr. Co. of Pbgh.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Penn-Lehigh Corp. AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Medical Tower Corporation v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Otis Elevator Co. v. Arey-Hauser Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Farrier v. Old Republic Insurance (In Re Farrier)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API