Legal Opinion

Myers v. Doe

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 12, 2001No. 2-00-423-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLMAN, Justice.

Appehees contend that the facts of this case are shocking and outrageous. Mary Doe, a special education student who functions at the level of a six to eight-year-old, was sexually assaulted while at school. By the next day, Appehants Terry Myers, Keith Burgett, Christy Hackett, and Norma Nardone knew about the incident. After Mary was sexually assaulted at school two more times, Appehees John and Jane Doe, individually and on behalf of Mary Doe, fhed suit against Appehants alleging that they failed to effectively carry out mandatory duties and were negligent in…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re HinterlongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Rape v. M.O. Dental LabCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Salazar v. Collins, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  4. Smith v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Brenda Gail Rape v. M.O. Dental Lab, Gerald W. Carter, Michael K. Zuber, and Lora Zuber, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API