Legal Opinion

McNutt v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 2, 1932No. 8 Div. 419PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

2Per curiam

Upon the original consideration of this cause, the writ was denied without an opinion. Counsel for the defendant, upon rehearing, stresses in support of same error upon the part of the trial court as to an exception to the oral charge as well as a refusal of his requested charge D. It is sufficient to say, in response to this insistence, that these questions were not so treated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals as to enable this court to review same upon certiorari.

As stated in the case of Whisenant v. State, 223 Ala. 550, 137 So. 457: “If, as counsel suggest, the question…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Folmar v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Whisenant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Simpson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Berness v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Haynes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Sprangler v. BarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API