Legal Opinion
People v. Di John
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 8, 2008PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Steuben County Court (Joseph W Latham, J.), entered November 4, 2005. The order determined *1303that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). We reject the contention of defendant that County Court’s assessment of 20 points against him under risk factor 4, continuing course of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. KearnsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. KearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. DonkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. WorrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. LashwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.