Legal Opinion
Ehorn v. ABANDONED SHIPWRECK KNOWN AS THE ROSINCO
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 9, 2002No. 00-C-1086Published
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CALLAHAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, Paul L. Ehorn (“Ehorn”), commenced this action when on August 7, 2000, he filed an in rem complaint in admiralty asserting his claim to all right, title, and interest in the Rosinco, her tackle, appurtenances, furnishings, and cargo. According to the complaint, the plaintiff “searched for and discovered the Rosinco lying on the bed of Lake Michigan, approximately twelve miles off shore [of] Ke-nosha, Wisconsin .... Subsequent to Plaintiffs discovery of the Rosinco in September, 1977, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Philip R. Visser v. Packer Engineering Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Arthur Oates v. Discovery Zone, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.