Legal Opinion

Imel v. Travelers Indemnity Company

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1972No. 1271A269PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, P.J.

Appellant Imel (Imel) filed suit against his insurance company (Travelers) to collect $2000 for medical and hospital bills resulting from an automobile accident in which he was involved. The rhetorical paragraph of the complaint that raises the issue for decision in this appeal reads as follows:

“6. That plaintiff has performed all of the conditions of said policy of insurance to be performed by him except, that with reference to Condition No. 28 of said policy, entitled ‘28. Subrogation’, plaintiff has refused to execute and deliver instruments and papers to secure defendant’s right to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Marks v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Hospital Service Corp. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  5. Kroeker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Associates Transports, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Erie Insurance Co. v. GeorgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Midtown Chiropractic v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Allstate Insurance v. ReitlerMontana Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API