Legal Opinion
Schlich v. Broad Inst., Inc. (In Re Schlich)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 20, 2018No. 17-1377PPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
*43 Petitioner-Appellant George W. Schlich, a patent agent for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc., appeals from the district court's denial of a petition for discovery under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 . That statute allows a party to file a petition in district court to obtain discovery for use in a foreign proceeding. Here, Schlich sought discovery from Respondents-Appellees The Broad Institute, Inc., Dr. Feng Zhang, Dr. Naomi Habib, and Dr. Le Cong (collectively, "Broad") in relation to opposition proceedings currently before the European Patent Office ("EPO"). In the opposition…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Euromepa S.A. v. R. Esmerian, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- In Re Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Mees v. BuiterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Banca Pueyo SA v. Lone Star Fund IXCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Department of Caldas v. Diageo PLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Cpc Patent Technologies Pty Ltd. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- In re Application of Venequip, S.A. v. Caterpillar Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Abubakar v. Chicago State UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.