Legal Opinion

Zara Realty Holding Corp. v. Espinal

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided August 19, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernard S. Greenbaum, J.

Respondent was lawfully evicted July 21, 1994. On July 22, *2431994, posteviction, the respondent moved by order to show cause for an order, among other relief, restoring respondent to possession of the subject premises on the ground that the failure to pay rent was occasioned by the Department of Social Services’ failure to make the rent payments to petitioner. The respondent is a recipient of relief available pursuant to Jiggetts v Grinker (75 NY2d 411) from the Department of Social Services. The respondent claims she defaulted through no fault of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jiggetts v. GrinkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Perrotta v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. MATTER OF PERROTTA v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Davern Realty Corp. v. VaughnAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dayton Towers Corp. v. GethersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Tobias Corp. v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API