Legal Opinion

Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 8, 1970No. 66 Civ. 1265PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TYLER, District Judge.

This court originally determined that this case was not an appropriate class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 41 F.R.D. 147 (S.D.N. Y.1966). That decision was reversed by the Court of Appeals and remanded for further consideration of factors governing the propriety of a class action. Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555 (2d Cir. 1968). Pursuant to the Court of Appeals opinion and after a long delay having no relevance to the issues,1 discovery, conferences and hearings have been conducted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  4. Korn v. Franchard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Paddison v. Fidelity BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API