Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TYLER, District Judge.
This court originally determined that this case was not an appropriate class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 41 F.R.D. 147 (S.D.N. Y.1966). That decision was reversed by the Court of Appeals and remanded for further consideration of factors governing the propriety of a class action. Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555 (2d Cir. 1968). Pursuant to the Court of Appeals opinion and after a long delay having no relevance to the issues,1 discovery, conferences and hearings have been conducted to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Korn v. Franchard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Paddison v. Fidelity BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.