Kruse v. Seiffert & Weise Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — Hon. N. W. Macy, Judge. Action at law to recover for services rendered. There was a trial by jury, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.
— For several years prior to February, 1889, the firm of Seiffert & Weise carried on in Minden, Iowa, the business of dealing in lumber and other merchandise. The chief place of business of the firm was at Avoca. In February, 1889, the firm was succeeded by the defendant, a corporation, which thereafter carried on business at Min-den as the firm had done before. The business at that place was in charge of Charles Altmansperger, who represented the firm, and afterwards the corporation, as agent. In January, 1896, he was found to have been guilty of criminal mismanagement of the business; was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Browne v. HickieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Foster v. . PerschNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- State v. MoelchenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Frost v. RosecransSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Bank of Monroe v. GiffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dille v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- City Deposit Bank v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Blossi v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Malloy v. DrumhellerWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.