State v. Apt
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
“[T]he purpose of the erasure statute [General Statutes § 54-142a]1 ... is to protect innocent persons from the harmful consequences of a criminal charge which is subsequently dismissed.” (Emphasis omitted; footnote added; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Morowitz, 200 Conn. 440, 451, 512 A.2d 175 (1986). The principal issue in this case is whether a court can enhance a defendant’s sentence for committing a crime while released on bond pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-40b2 when, prior to the sentencing, the records relating to the arrests that led to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. FERNANDO A.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. MorowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Landry v. SpitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Rado v. Board of Education of the Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. AnonymousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martin v. Hearst CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- State v. AptSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
- State v. AptSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015