Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Antonio MENDOZA; Gloria Mendoza; Amalia Mendoza, Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1997No. 95-30404PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYMER, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from the dismissal for improper venue of two counts of an indictment charging Antonio, Gloria, and Amalia Mendoza with aiding and abetting the possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in the Western District of Washington, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846.

The Mendozas argued that venue was improper in this district because the substantive offense so far as they were concerned was begun and completed in California, where on the government’s theory they sold cocaine to James Chapman, who then transported it to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Daniel Bozza, Charles Mulhearn, Ronald Jones, Michael Pizzo, Salvatore Guarnieri, Anthony Delutro, A/K/A Tony WestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. Bennie Ray Winship, A/K/A Nip, and Jerry BiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. William Herman JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Andres Ruelas-ArreguinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Valdez-SantosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. City of Tukwila v. GarrettWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. United States v. Rami GhanemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. City of Tukwila v. GarrettWashington Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API