Legal Opinion
Claim of Greenwald v. Electro Metallurgical Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 20, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The question in this case is whether the employer or the Special Fund for Reopened Cases is liable for compensation upon the reopening of the case. The claimant suffered a back injury while in the employ of the National Grinding Wheel Co., on August 9, 1939. Compensation for one week was paid and the case was closed. The claimant enlisted in the United States Navy on March 18, 1942, and remained in service until he was discharged on September 27, 1945.
In the early part of August, 1949, claimant suffered an attack of lower back pain which the board has found is attributable to the original…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Casey v. Hinkle Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Claim of Bellini v. Great American Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Claim of Sturesky v. StraussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Claim of Schechter v. State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Claim of Wyski v. Brewer Dry Dock Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Crowl v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Claim of Longo v. M & F Auto WreckersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Claim of Marramao v. Manhattan Coat Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956