Legal Opinion

Claim of Crowl v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1966Published

1Per curiam

The order of the Appellate Division vacating the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board should be reversed and the decision of the board reinstated, without costs. The ultimate effect of this decision, however, is the same as that reached at the Appellate Division. That court in vacating the board’s determination affirming the Beferee’s decision imposing liability on the Special Fund, in effect left the Beferee’s decision unchanged. Our present decision affirming the board’s ruling also results in an affirmance of the Beferee’s decision. The important procedural difference is the Fund’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Greenwald v. Electro Metallurgical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API