Legal Opinion

Temple Building Associates v. Somerville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We note at the outset that the appeal was taken from an order that was subsumed in a subsequent judgment. In the exercise of our discretion, we treat the appeal as from the subsequent judgment (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; CPLR 5520 [c]). Following a bench trial. Supreme Court determined that plaintiff presented insufficient evidence of damages to support its causes of action for breach of an agreement to lease and dismissed those causes of action. We affirm. The damages recoverable for a prospective lessee’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. NussbaumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Shubert v. SondheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Dickerson v. MenschelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Shubert v. . SondheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API