Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Menschel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Sigmund Menschel, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 6th day of August, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury directed by the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 29th day of June, 1918, denying defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This is an action for damages for the breach of a contract executed in writing by the parties on the 22d day of March, *5491916. The plaintiff was the owner of premises known as Nos. 62-64 East Thirty-fourth street, in the borough of Manhattan, New York, upon which there stood certain buildings which are neither described by the contract nor by the evidence. The defendant, evidently, was desirous of obtaining a long term lease of the premises, but to conform the building to his requirements, which likewise are not stated, necessitated material alterations thereof and probably…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Mack v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Neal v. JeffersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Driggs v. DwightNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  5. Massie Rather v. State Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips of Fairfax, Inc. v. Chillum Terrace Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Kilbride v. WilsonMunicipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1970
  3. Hund v. BehringerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Temple Building Associates v. SomervilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API