Legal Opinion

McNeal v. Truesdell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 1934No. 20890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

In this case plaintiff in error, - plaintiff below, filed suit to foreclose a chattel and real estate mortgage executed by defendants in error, defendants in the trial court. Eor the sake of convenience the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Eor answer to plaintiff’s petition defendant filed answer and counterclaim alleging that usurious interest was charged and reserved in the contract. The case was tried to the court and resulted in favor of the defendants on their counterclaim for usury, and judgment entered for the plaintiff in the total sum of $195.

The trial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richardson v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter v. RubrechtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Miller v. BurkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Reeves v. First State BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API