Miller v. Burkett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This is an action in which the plaintiff, Norman Burkett, sought to recover on 13 counts usurious interest charged, reserved, or collected on loans made by the defendants. The court held that all but five of the 13 counts were barred by the statute of limitations and entered judgment on the five counts for $46, after allowing a deduction of $22.50 which plaintiff owed the defendants.
The court allowed plaintiff an attorney’s fee of $100. The defendants, George H. Miller and Edna Lind, doing business as Majestic Loan Company, have appealed from the judgment and raise two issues: (1) That the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sherwood v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Carter v. RubrechtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Maynard v. Maynard's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Deberry v. CavalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Bank of Buffalo v. VennSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- A. J. Simler v. Leslie L. Conner and Phillips Petroleum Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Driver v. TolstornogSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Walls v. RussellCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Simler v. ConnerDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.