Legal Opinion

In re Subpoena of Qualcomm Incorporated v. Tesla, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 1, 2026No. 3:25-cv-03197Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 IN RE SUBPOENA OF QUALCOMM Case No.: 3:25-cv-03197-DMS-VET 11 INCORPORATED ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 12 COMPEL THIRD-PARTY INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, 13 SUBPOENA AND GRANTING Plaintiff, MOTION TO SEAL 14 v. 15 [ECF Nos. 1, 4, 5] TESLA, INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 Before the Court is Intellectual Ventures II LLC’s (“IV”) Motion to Compel Rule 19 30(b)(6) Testimony and Document Production from Third-Party Qualcomm Incorporated. 20 (“Motion to Compel”). ECF No. 4. Therein, IV requests that the Court either transfer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Knight v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API