Green v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Judge.
The offense is murder with malice; the punishment, life.
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not challenged. The appellant testified he shot the deceased but claimed self defense. The jury by their verdict rejected such defense.
In three grounds of error appellant complains of the State’s jury argument.
It is observed that to none of the arguments now complained of did the appellant at any time object, call the trial court’s attention thereto, ask for an instruction or a mistrial or any type of relief. We cannot conclude that the error or errors, if…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Ferrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Keel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Van Bibber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Hintz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Satillan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Atkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970