Legal Opinion
Hintz v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 27, 1965No. 38426PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICE, Commissioner.
The offense is murder; the punishment, death.
The state’s evidence shows that appellant and the deceased were husband and wife. The two lived in a room which they rented from Mr. and Mrs. W. D. Yates at 90S Southland in the city of Fort Worth. On Sunday afternoon, February 16, 1964, Mr. and Mrs. Yates saw the deceased leave the premises, which was the last time they saw her alive. At such time, appellant was inside the house and the next time he was seen by either of them was on February 27, when Mr. Yates saw him, early in the morning, asleep in his automobile, parked a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Cavazos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Duhamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Harold C. Hintz v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.