Legal Opinion
Lamar Advertising Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided October 23, 2003No. CIV.A. 03-437-APublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOHN V. PARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Lamar Advertising Company (“Lamar”), has filed a motion for partial summary judgment (doc. 4), and defendant, Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”), has filed a motion for summary judgment (doc. 17). Both motions are opposed (docs. 13, 27, and 28). There is no need for oral argument. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
In its motion, Lamar alleges that Continental is obligated, pursuant to a commercial general liability insurance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Yount v. MaisanoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Succession of Fannaly v. Lafayette Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wagner v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020