Legal Opinion
Foster v. Philadelphia Manufacturers
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 30, 1991No. 3483 C.D. 1986 (AF)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRUMLISH, Jr., Senior Judge.
Philadelphia Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company (Philadelphia Manufacturers) 1 preliminarily objects to the complaint filed by Constance Foster, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth, in her capacity as the statutory rehabilitator (Rehabilitator) of the Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland Insurance Company (Mutual Fire). 2
Briefly stated, the Rehabilitator’s complaint avers that Mutual Fire and Philadelphia Manufacturers entered into a series of facultative reinsurance and retrocession treaties, which Philadelphia Manufacturers breached in at least…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ambridge Borough Water Authority v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Emmaus Municipal Authority v. EltzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Waddell v. ShriberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Vento v. VentoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Grode v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Samuel J. Marranca General Contracting Co. v. Amerimar Cherry Hill Associates Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Maleski v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Koken v. Cologne Reinsurance (Barbados), Ltd.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Foster v. Home InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Koken v. Reliance InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.