In Re the Marriage of Malwitz
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Justice.
Susan Malwitz appeals a ruling by the court of appeals reversing the trial court's finding that it had personal jurisdiction over her non-resident husband, Reginald Parr (the "Defendant", in an action for dissolution of marriage and child support. In re the Marriage of Malwitz, 81 P.3d 1076 (Colo.App.2003). Because we conclude that the trial court possessed both statutory and constitutional authority to exercise jurisdiction over the Defendant, we reverse the court of appeals and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. Facts and Proceedings Below
In April…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Archangel Diamond Corp. v. LukoilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- First Horizon Merchant Services, Inc. v. Wellspring Capital Management, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Magill v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- I.S.H. v. M.D.B.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.