Legal Opinion

Iowa Telephone Ass'n v. City of Hawarden

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 1999No. 97-83PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

Appellee, the City of Hawarden, intends to provide land-line local telephone service to customers located within and outside of its municipal corporate limits. Appellant, Iowa Telephone Association (ITA), sought a declaratory ruling that the City was prohibited by statute from providing such service. See Iowa Code §§ 23A.2 (prohibiting government competition with private enterprise with certain exceptions), 384.81 (requiring cities that operate a city utility to do so in accordance with the provisions of the city code of Iowa) (1995). The City’s motion to dismiss ITA’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. DeVoss v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chemical, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Sanford v. ManternachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Van Essen v. Farmers Cooperative ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Lincoln Electric System v. Nebraska Public Service CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API