Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Morton
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 12, 1976No. CIV. 74-139-TUC-WCFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FREY, District Judge.
The complaint in the present case was brought pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act to seek judicial review of a final decision of the Department of Interior. (See paragraphs I and II of plaintiffs’ complaint).
Defendants-Contestants DeVilbiss are stock raising homestead patentees. On June 15, 1967, they filed a private contest complaint with the Bureau of Land Management alleging that certain mining claims belonging to Plaintiffs-Contestees Thomas, located on DeVilbiss’ patented homestead land and Taylor Grazing lease, were null and void for lack of discovery.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grand Canyon Trust v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- Thomas v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Thomas v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977