Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Andrus

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1977No. 76-1548PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Albert Thomas and wife appeal a judgment in the district court which affirmed a decision by the Secretary of Interior declaring invalid certain mining claims for want of a valid discovery. See Thomas v. Morton, 408 F.Supp. 1361 (D.Ariz.1976).

The principal issue on appeal is whether the owners of surface (grazing) rights had standing to challenge the mineral discoveries claimed by the Thomas interests.

The district judge was confronted with a question that had not been squarely presented in this court. He reasoned by analogy from Duguid v. Best, 291 F.2d 235 (9th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 372…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Multiple Use, Inc. v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Thomas v. MortonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1976
  3. Duguid v. BestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API