Todd v. Andalkar
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Marc Todd appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Fritzsche, J.) following a jury verdict in favor of Stephens Memorial Hospital, Rat-nakar Andalkar, and Hugh Robinson on his complaint seeking damages for their alleged professional negligence in his medical care. 1 Todd contends that the court abused its discretion by denying him the right to cross-examine Andalkar’s expert witness, Jeremy Morton, on issues of potential bias. We agree, and accordingly, we vacate the judgment.
[¶2] The record discloses the following: On the evening of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Irish v. GimbelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Miller v. SzelenyiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Minott v. FW Cunningham & SonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Taylor v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Ross v. ReynoldsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Merrill v. Sugarloaf Mountain Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Jacob v. KippaxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Waterville Industries, Inc. v. Finance AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Anderson v. O'RourkeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- McDaniel v. PickensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.