Legal Opinion

Todd v. Andalkar

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 1, 1997PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Marc Todd appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Fritzsche, J.) following a jury verdict in favor of Stephens Memorial Hospital, Rat-nakar Andalkar, and Hugh Robinson on his complaint seeking damages for their alleged professional negligence in his medical care. 1 Todd contends that the court abused its discretion by denying him the right to cross-examine Andalkar’s expert witness, Jeremy Morton, on issues of potential bias. We agree, and accordingly, we vacate the judgment.

[¶2] The record discloses the following: On the evening of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Irish v. GimbelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  2. Miller v. SzelenyiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  3. Minott v. FW Cunningham & SonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Taylor v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. Ross v. ReynoldsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Sugarloaf Mountain Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Jacob v. KippaxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Waterville Industries, Inc. v. Finance AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. Anderson v. O'RourkeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  5. McDaniel v. PickensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API