Legal Opinion

Peabody Coal Co. v. Hicks

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1992No. 91-SC-571-WCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT

After a complete review of the briefs and applicable statutory provisions, the Opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The Court of Appeals thoroughly considered the issue presented, and we concur with its disposition of the case. For this reason, we adopt the Opinion of the Court of Appeals: “BEFORE: EMBERTON, GUDGEL, and HAYES, Judges.

“GUDGEL, JUDGE: This is an appeal from an opinion entered by the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming an administrative law judge’s award of benefits to the claimant, appellee Hicks. Appellant employer’s sole contention on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westvaco Corp. v. FondawKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Phillip Morris, Inc. v. PoynterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Denairo Mining Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Moore v. Sunstone Energy, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Max & Erma's v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API