Legal Opinion

Phillip Morris, Inc. v. Poynter

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 23, 1990No. 89-CA-001954-WCPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAYTON, Judge:

This appeal arises from a workers’ compensation claim filed by Poynter. At issue •are certain medical bills which Phillip Morris, Inc., the employer, and its insurance carrier have refused to pay. After a joint session, the administrative law judges overruled Poynter’s motion to require payment of the bills, and the Workers’ Compensation Board, by a two-to-one decision, set aside the ALJs’ order and remanded the matter for entry of an order sustaining Poynter’s motion. The employer thereafter prosecuted the present appeal to this court, and we now affirm.

On February 23, 1987,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zurich Insurance Co. v. MitchellKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Westvaco Corp. v. FondawKentucky Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitee Enterprises v. YatesKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  2. National Pizza Co. v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1991
  3. Richey v. Perry Arnold, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  4. R.J. Corman Railroad Construction v. HaddixKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Peabody Coal Co. v. GoforthKentucky Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API