Legal Opinion

Railway Register Manuf'g Co. v. North Hudson C. R. Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided February 3, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtNixon, J.

When the above case came up for final hearing, the counsel for the defendants raised two preliminary questions, which were supposed to be decisive, and which, if ruled in favor of the defendants, would relieve the court from the duty of considering the controversy upon its merits. The two questions were (1) whether the complainant’s patent was not invalid because no written specifications and claim wore, in fact, signed by the inventor, nor was his signature attested by two witnesses, as required by the statute, before the letters patent could bo issued; (2) whether the letters patent were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Jackson ex dem. Mancius v. LawtonNew York Supreme Court · 1813

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cold Metal Process Co. v. UNITED STATES ENG. & FOUNDRY CO.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Western Glass Co. v. Schmertz Wire-Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
  3. Hallock v. Babcock Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1903
  4. Fahrenwald v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API