Legal Opinion

State v. Kurent

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1919No. 21,797PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Crawford district court; Andeew J. Cueean, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*14The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This is another liquor case. The defendants, husband and wife, were joined and prosecuted on one information, and were convicted on two counts under the “bone-dry” law, and on one count for keeping a liquor nuisance. They appeal.

The defendant, Mrs. Kurent, filed a motion to sever and fora continuance. There was no evidence offered to prove the facts alleged in the motion, and the motion was submitted to the trial court without argument. In view of this, it must be held that the motion was properly overruled. Even if the motion had been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. State v. MacekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. State v. SillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API