Legal Opinion

Auto Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1937No. 26262PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. The defendant in a civil ease is entitled to the opening and concluding argument when he introduces no evidence, and a denial of this right is error requiring the grant of a new trial. Moore v. Carey, 116 Ga. 28 (5) (42 S. E. 258); Newsome v. Harrell, 146 Ga. 139 (2) (90 S. E. 885); Williamson v. Williamson, 176 Ga. 510 (168 S. E. 256); Widincamp v. Widincamp, 135 Ga. 644-6 (70 S. E. 566); Phelps v. Thurman, 74 Ga. 837 (a); Chapman v. Atlanta & West Point R., 74 Ga. 547 (a); Willett Seed Co. v. Kirkeby-Gundestrup Seed Co., 145 Ga. 559 (89 S. E. 486). This is true even though plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. CareySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Chapman v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Willett Seed Co. v. Kirkeby-Gundestrup Seed Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Cable Co. v. ParanthaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. TGM Ashley Lakes, Inc. v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. American Casualty Company v. SeckingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Jones v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. ASSOCIATED CAB COMPANY v. ByarsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Old Republic Life Insurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API