Legal Opinion

Jackson v. City of Grand Forks

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Liability of city — damages — sidewalks — snow and ice.

1. A city may be held liable in an action for damages where the evidence, of, at least, some of the witnesses, which is believed by the jury, shows that a portion of a sidewalk has remained covered with ice and snow during the whole winter, and such ice and snow has been allowed to thaw and freeze and accumulate during such time, and no effort has been made by the city either to remove it, or cause the same to be removed, or to sprinkle it with sand or other substance in order to render it less dangerous; and the evidence also shows that…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. PowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Pomfrey v. . Village of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Blanchard v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Pyke v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of East Chicago v. GilbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Donovan v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Keller v. Vermeer Manufacturing CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Belt v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McCave v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API