Legal Opinion
Tri-Dam v. Frazier
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 18, 2022No. 1:20-cv-00408Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TRI-DAM, Case No. 1:20-cv-00408-SKO 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 v. (Docs. 38, 45) 12 SCOTT FRAZIER, 13 Defendant. 14 _____________________________________/ 15 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Tri-Dam (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Scott Frazier 19 (“Defendant”), alleging causes of action for violation of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”), 16 U.S.C. 20 § 825p, public nuisance, private nuisance, trespass, and interference with express easement. (Doc. 21 1 (“Compl.”).)…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.