Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Village of Plainfield
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 16, 2013No. 08 CV 3293PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOAN HUMPHREY LEFKOW, District Judge.
In this § 1983 civil rights action, plaintiffs, Mark E. Murphy and Pamela S. Murphy (“the Murphys”), claim that the Village of Plainfield (“the Village”) and Plainfield Township (“the Township”) took their property in violation of the takings clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution (Count V). The Murphys also claim that the Village deprived them of equal protection of the laws based on a class-of-one theory of selective prosecution. (Count VII). Am. Compl. at 16. They also assert against…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Union of Operating Engineers Local 139 v. SchimelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016
- Bezingue v. Steuben Lakes Regional Waste DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
- Tranchita v. CallahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022