Legal Opinion

City of Huntingburg v. Phoenix Natural Resources, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1993No. 19A01-9307-CV-246PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

May a trial court consider evidence of an Indiana legislator's interpretation of an unambiguous statute? The appellant-plaintiff City of Huntingburg, Indiana (City) appeals the trial court's denial of a preliminary injunction to enjoin the coal mining operations of the appellee-defendant Phoenix Natural Resources, Inc. (Phoenix).

ISSUES

The parties raise the following issues on appeal:

1. Should the appeal be dismissed as moot?

2. Did the trial court properly admit a legislator's testimony of the construction of an unambiguous statute?

3. Did the trial court properly interpret "urban…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Matter of LawranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Indiana Aeronautics Commission v. Ambassadair, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. O'LAUGHLIN v. BartonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Union Township School Corp. v. State Ex Rel. JoyceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. City of Evansville v. ZirkelbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. W.R.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Town of Chandler v. Indiana-American Water Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Lake County Sheriff's Corrections Merit Board v. PeronIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API