City of Huntingburg v. Phoenix Natural Resources, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
May a trial court consider evidence of an Indiana legislator's interpretation of an unambiguous statute? The appellant-plaintiff City of Huntingburg, Indiana (City) appeals the trial court's denial of a preliminary injunction to enjoin the coal mining operations of the appellee-defendant Phoenix Natural Resources, Inc. (Phoenix).
ISSUES
The parties raise the following issues on appeal:
1. Should the appeal be dismissed as moot?
2. Did the trial court properly admit a legislator's testimony of the construction of an unambiguous statute?
3. Did the trial court properly interpret "urban…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Matter of LawranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Indiana Aeronautics Commission v. Ambassadair, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
- O'LAUGHLIN v. BartonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union Township School Corp. v. State Ex Rel. JoyceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Evansville v. ZirkelbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- W.R.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Town of Chandler v. Indiana-American Water Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Lake County Sheriff's Corrections Merit Board v. PeronIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.