Legal Opinion

Poulson v. Louisiana, Arkansas & Texas Transp. Co.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1947No. Civ. Nos. 1963, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTERIE, District Judge.

We have read attentively the briefs filed by each side on the question of whether or not the above two cases should be consolidated.

Damages are sought in each case against the same defendant. There was only one accident, the collision of a four-passenger automobile with the freight truck and trailer of defendant. All legal relations between any and all parties arose at this one time of collision. The issues of fact and the applicable principles of law are the same — except the added principle of law that under certain conditions the negligence of the driver of a car…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Polito v. MolaskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. American Window Glass Co. v. NoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
  3. National Nut Co. of California v. Susu Nut Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
  4. Diggs v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  5. Mankin v. BartleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Capstraw v. New York Cent. R.District Court, N.D. New York · 1954
  2. Dupont v. Southern Pacific Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API