Legal Opinion

Dupont v. Southern Pacific Co.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided June 12, 1964No. Civ. A. Nos. 8896, 9113, 9114, 9124Published

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, having lost these suits by verdicts returned by a jury in favor of defendants, have now made application-to the Court for permission to proseeutetheir appeals in forma pauperis, pursuant to Rule 75 (m), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., and Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915 and' § 753.

Under § 1915 the Court is required to make a determination that the appeals are taken in good faith, and under § 753-before payment for the stenographic transcript can be made the Court must, certify that the appeals are not frivolous but present substantial questions for determination.

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Jack v. K. Ragan v. Colonel Weldon W. Cox, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Lucille M. Rankin, Administratrix on the Estate of Ronald Rankin, Deceased v. Shayne Brothers, Inc., Billy F. Rankin v. Shayne Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API