Dupont v. Southern Pacific Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
PUTNAM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, having lost these suits by verdicts returned by a jury in favor of defendants, have now made application-to the Court for permission to proseeutetheir appeals in forma pauperis, pursuant to Rule 75 (m), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., and Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915 and' § 753.
Under § 1915 the Court is required to make a determination that the appeals are taken in good faith, and under § 753-before payment for the stenographic transcript can be made the Court must, certify that the appeals are not frivolous but present substantial questions for determination.
The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jack v. K. Ragan v. Colonel Weldon W. Cox, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Lucille M. Rankin, Administratrix on the Estate of Ronald Rankin, Deceased v. Shayne Brothers, Inc., Billy F. Rankin v. Shayne Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.