Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. Dimon

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 15, 2015No. 425, 2015PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRINE, Chief Justice:

This Court has received the request from our distinguished colleagues on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to answer the following question:

If a shareholder demands that a board of directors investigate both an underlying wrongdoing' and subsequent misstatements by corporate officers about that wrongdoing, what factors should a court consider in deciding whether the board acted in a grossly negligent fashion by focusing its investigation solely on the underlying wrongdoing? 1

The inspiration for this question is a contention by the plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Levine v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  4. Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. NAF Holdings, LLC v. Li & Fung (Trading) Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. F5 Capital v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Citigroup Inc. v. AHW Investment Partnership, MFS, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  3. AHW Investment Partnership v. Citigroup Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  4. Espinoza v. DimonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  5. AHW Investment Partnership v. Citigroup Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API