Legal Opinion

Cooper v. STOCK YARDS BANK OF OKL. CITY, OKL.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1982No. 53516PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYDSTON, Judge.

Bank appeals from a $33,151.37 judgment awarded to Bank’s Customer who alleged Bank erroneously honored checks signed by unauthorized person. Bank alleges trial court erred by holding: (1) Customer need not prove he was damaged by wrongful payment though checks were paid to Customer’s creditors; (2) each check is not a separate cause of action; and (3) Customer who did not review bank statement is not bound to protest irregularity within 14 days.

Trial was to the court after both sides waived jury trial. The judgment of a court sitting in cases of legal cognizance must be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Story v. HefnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Rollins v. RayhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Turner v. PittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Blomquist v. Zions First National Bank, N. A.Utah Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Holland v. PerraultSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ed Stinn Chevrolet, Inc. v. National City BankOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Isaac v. American Heritage Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Small v. BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Balsbaugh v. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
  5. Balsbaugh v. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API