Legal Opinion

In re Richards

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 25, 1903No. 7,273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

Receivers were appointed on an involuntary petition, and for some time carried on the business of the bankrupt with skill and success. They have been allowed by the referee compensation based upon the theory that the aggregate-compensation of receivers and trustees is in no case to exceed the maximum- allowed the trustee under section 48, Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 557 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3439]. The reasoning in support of the theory is this: The duties of the trustee may require him to carry on the bankrupt’s business, as well as ’ to distribute the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Carolina Cooperage Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. In re Cambridge Lumber Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1905
  3. Eberle v. DrennanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. In re Metropolitan Motor Car Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API