Legal Opinion

In re Cambridge Lumber Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 18, 1905No. 9,331PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

This case concerns the allowance to be made to a receiver for conducting the business of the bankrupt. Under the original act of 1898, a receiver’s compensation was not limited by statute, but only by the discretion of the court, like that of a receiver in equity. In re Adams Sartorial Co. (D. C.) 101 Fed. 215; In re Scott (D. C.) 99 Fed. 404. The compensation of a trustee,-on the other hand, was fixed by section 48a of Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 557 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3439], “as full compensation for their services * * * from estates which they have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Adams Sartorial Art Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1900
  2. In re RichardsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1903
  3. In re ScottDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. In re George W. Shiebler & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. In re LeonardDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API