Legal Opinion
Cincotta v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 25, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to *559recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants VRD Construction Corp., Bruzzese & Sons Construction Corp., and Vincent Bruzzese appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Bruno, J.), dated May 7, 2001, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The appellants failed to satisfy their initial burden of making a prima…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sterling v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Carrington v. Commissioner of Westchester County Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doe v. Orange-Ulster Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Daries v. Haym Solomon Home for AgedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Solis v. AguilarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Jablonski v. Fulton Corners Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2002
- Silverman v. SciartelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.