Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
In its amended complaint, plaintiff has made a demand for a jury trial, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 38. Defendant, arguing that the EEOC is not entitled to a jury trial in suits filed by it under the ADEA, moves to strike that demand. Plaintiff defends its right to a trial by jury on two grounds. First, defendant’s motion to strike the demand has not been timely made; and, second, the right of the EEOC to a trial by jury is guaranteed by statute.
TIMELINESS OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION
Rule 39(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that(a) When trial by jury…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lunsford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Raymond W. Jones and v. A. Sauls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Morelock v. NCR Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Harpole Construction, Inc. v. Medallion Midstream, LLC (In re Harpole Construction, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2017