Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-3200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAROKIN, District Judge.

In its amended complaint, plaintiff has made a demand for a jury trial, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 38. Defendant, arguing that the EEOC is not entitled to a jury trial in suits filed by it under the ADEA, moves to strike that demand. Plaintiff defends its right to a trial by jury on two grounds. First, defendant’s motion to strike the demand has not been timely made; and, second, the right of the EEOC to a trial by jury is guaranteed by statute.

TIMELINESS OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION

Rule 39(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that(a) When trial by jury…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Raymond W. Jones and v. A. Sauls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. Morelock v. NCR Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Harpole Construction, Inc. v. Medallion Midstream, LLC (In re Harpole Construction, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API