Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Shipowners Assn. of Pacific Coast

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 22, 1926No. 306PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

This is a suit to enjoin the respondents from maintaining a combination in restraint of interstate and foreign commerce in violation of § 1 of the Anti-Trust Act, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209, and to recover damages. Such a suit is authorized by §§ 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, c. 323, 38 Stat. 730, 731, 737. Duplex Co. v. Deering, 254 U. S. 443, 464-465. Upon respondents’ motion, the district court dismissed the bill of complaint, apparently upon the merits, and the circuit court of appeals affirmed the decree. 10 F. (2d) 96. The only question necessary to be considered here is whether the bill…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API