Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Brown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2004No. Docket 122458PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

At issue here is whether plaintiffs attorney had a reasonable belief under MCL 600.2912d(l) that plaintiffs medical expert satisfied the expert witness requirements of MCL 600.2169 in order to sign plaintiffs affidavit of merit. We hold that plaintiffs attorney had such a reasonable belief. Having reached the same conclusion, the circuit court decision is affirmed, and this case is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

I. FACTS

Plaintiffs husband, Fred Grossman, went to defendant Sinai Hospital to undergo an elective carotid endarterectomy (surgical removal of the lining of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tryc v Michigan Veterans’ FacilityMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Halloran v. BhanMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Omelenchuk v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. SchaeferMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Jenkins v. PatelMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cox v. Eric J. Hartman, M.D., & Blue Water Obstetrics & Gynecology Prof'l Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Woodard v. CusterMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API